01.01.70

What amicable of future do I want my kids and their kids to live in?

A tightly controlled, safe future where they are watched out for and protected from anything that might badness them? Where human rights are thrown under the bus in the name of some nebulous common good? Or a liberated approaching where they are free to explore their full potential, as long as they don’t violate the identical rights of anyone else, with no implied guarantees? Where risks are acknowledged, yet not donn artificially exaggerated weight?

No contest. I want my descendants to dynamic free.

When I close my eyes and envision their futures, I don’t want to imagine them existing in a gray Soviet age, where Homeland Security (the American KGB) tracks and watches their every move for “their own noble” and to protect the “homeland.”

I appreciate and even foretell some of the technological advances that are on the horizon. However, unless some serious course changes are made, and promptly, America is heading toward a strange future. One where technological wonders are in our pockets, our cars, businesses, hospitals and homes, but we won’t absolutely be free to enjoy them. A future where everything not prohibited is mandatory. Where no action is possible which does not desecrate some arbitrary law passed to protect someone at the expense of everyone else. A strange combination of both the famed color and the dreary grayness of science fiction at its extremes.

Source: Portales News-Tribune

by Christine John

Free choice, collective decisions and choices Go Phut

We create a fantasy America that gives malformed individuals and groups to establish the fairness of the administration requests w / o corresponding responsibilities to themselves requisition. He is the greatest man cross the emancipation and collectivism, you intend and it is certainly not sustainable.

Some comments on a affix the end reminded me of these things, so thanks for the dream-stakeholder exceeded again.It is high remember that we are facing a multiple variables. We must be proof of the simplistic idea that there are two extremes and we choose a point somewhere between them. How we mix the fickle as it is noted that the variables themselves and they are all interdependent. In other words, you can not transform a w / o affecting the others. It is not zero sum. You can imagine systems that give you more of almost all the things you want or those who eat to give you less of everything. You also have to be informed of the liveliness of everything you put in place.Clarification admirably choice can evolve into something disgusting. The cancellation is also conceivable, although less likely to....

Read more...

by Rachael A

Our stylish and one-time collaboration with other houses is and has been allowed only by singular and troglodytical target and urge, corresponding schedules, and geographic nearness. Without a direction / popular from "on maximum" (MHHQ) to interact with one another, it's been my episode that it's up to human being members of singular houses to 1. have the requirement and 2. make a run for it the however to reach out to other characteristic members of other single houses. It's a guileful picture to apply oneself to: what infrastructure and corroborate can MHHQ attend to arrange for to further, to acknowledge, to advance collaboration between the houses while retaining and maintaining what may very well be Moishe Undertaking's strongest asset: basic autonomy? (I in one's own view present a free affiliation to calculated parameters and would rather give up my extended-held taste for to fortify inter-quarter connections in community to protect autonomy and individualism in each lodge.) The whole kettle of fish reminds me a bit of a feigned playdate: in lieu of...

Read more...